Captive lions aren’t the only winner in South Africa’s momentous ‘new deal’ for wildlife
Captive lions aren’t the only winner in South Africa’s momentous ‘new deal’
for wildlife
Tracy Keeling, The Canary
May 6, 2021
See link
https://www.thecanary.co/discovery/analysis-discovery/2021/05/06/captive-lions-arent-the-only-winner-in-south-africas-momentous-new-deal-for-wildlife/
for photo & 6-minute audio of article.
The South African government made a momentous move on 2 May. It released
and endorsed a report that, as Don Pinnock explained in the Daily Maverick,
calls for “the protection of iconic wild animals” to take priority “over
the cruelty of commercial exploitation”.
The report’s recommendations include bringing an end to lion farming in the
country. It also calls for a halt to many of the trades associated with
such farming. This includes cub petting, ‘canned’ lion hunting, and the
sale of lion bones. In short, implementation of the report’s
recommendations would close South Africa’s controversial captive lion
industry.
The good news doesn’t end there either. The report’s recommendations
relating to elephants and their ivory are also cause for celebration. The
minister of environment, forestry and fisheries Barbara Creecy asserted
that overall the report offers:
“a reconceptualised wildlife sector that will provide a new deal for people
and wildlife in the country.”
Captive Lions
As The Canary has previously reported, South Africa has a large captive
lion farming industry. A 2020 book claimed there are around 300 lion farms
in the country, which breed the big cats. Every stage in the life cycle of
these lions offers the opportunity for profit. As cubs, tourists and
volunteers pay to pet and care for them. When they’re a little older,
people pay to walk with them. Then hunters pay to kill them in so-called
‘canned’ hunts. Finally, the farms butcher their carcasses and sell their
bones for traditional Chinese medicine, which people pay to consume.
It’s an industry that comes with substantial disease risks and has been
dogged by scandals over the welfare of lions in captivity. As Pinnock has
previously documented, South Africa has suffered serious reputational
damage as a result of it. So the government’s embracing of the 580-page
High-Level Panel (HLP) report essentially signals that the industry comes
at a cost that’s too high to bear – both in terms of reputation and
wildlife conservation. As the report states, the captive lion industry:
“posed risks to the sustainability of wild lion conservation resulting from
the negative impact on ecotourism which funds lion conservation and
conservation more broadly.”
However, the report does endorse “responsible and authentic hunting”
(whatever that means), so trophy hunting in general appears set to
continue. It also leaves the door open for hunting of “ranched lions”.
Pinnock says ‘ranched lions’ is a “uniquely SA definition not accepted by
the rest of the world” and notes that:
“there is concern that the cessation of hunting of captive bred lions may
simply be replaced by the hunting of “ranched lions.”
Elephant Ivory
The report also recommends that “as long as current specified circumstances
prevail” South Africa should desist from submitting a proposal to the
global wildlife trading body CITES on trading ivory. This recommendation is
significant, too.
CITES banned international trade in new ivory around 30 years ago. However,
a legal trade remained for older or antique ivory which has allowed the
continuation of some international trade. CITES also provides effective
exemptions for what it deems non-commercial and personal trade. So, for
example, with the correct CITES permits, it’s legal for trophy hunters to
kill elephants and take their ivory. CITES doesn’t regulate domestic
markets, which can be substantial too. Some countries have, however, moved
to largely shut domestic legal markets down.
In 1999 and 2008, CITES allowed so-called ‘one-off’ international sales of
stockpiled ivory from Botswana, Zimbabwe, and Namibia. CITES added South
Africa to the list of approved sellers for the 2008 sale. As the Revelator
noted, the results were “disastrous” for elephants. Charan Saunders wrote
that:
“the sales led to an increase in demand and, consequently, an increase in
elephant poaching. The 2008 ivory sale was accompanied by a 66% increase in
illegally traded ivory and a 71% increase in ivory smuggling.”
In his book It’s Not About the Bats, journalist and author Adam Cruise also
noted that, according to the results of the 2016 Great Elephant Census, the
continent’s elephant population “had declined by a third in the seven years
since the second one-time sale”.
“A Seismic Shift”
South Africa is one of a number of southern African countries that have
advocated for increased international trade in ivory. As the East African
reported, for example, South Africa and five other countries “resolved to
lobby” CITES to “lift the embargo” on international trade in ivory in 2019.
So the HLP report’s recommendation relating to ivory is important. As
Cruise told The Canary:
“This is a seismic shift in policy since SA was one of the leading
proponents of trading in ivory internationally. With South Africa stepping
back, it will undoubtedly take the wind out of the other proponents –
Botswana, Namibia, eSwatini, Zambia and Zimbabwe.”
Cruise also highlighted efforts by the African Elephant Coalition (AEC) to
secure all African elephant populations the highest protections within
CITES, which would rule out the international trading of new ivory almost
entirely. The AEC is a formal coalition that “includes 28 of the 36 African
elephant range states”. Cruise said South Africa’s ‘stepping back’ on ivory:
“may finally open the door for CITES to adopt the counter-proposals of the
AEC calling for the full protection of all African elephants under Appendix
I. Of course, it remains to be seen what ramifications this does have with
the other proponents but it is indeed a very welcome development for
African elephants.”
As with all political pronouncements and policies, the devil will be in the
detail – and the implementation. But the South African government’s
endorsement of the report’s recommendations on the captive lion industry
and international trade in elephants’ ivory is a most welcome start.