How to reduce human-jumbo conflict without harming either
Sreedhar Vijayakrishnan, Times of India
March 12, 2024
See link
https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/how-to-reduce-human-jumbo-conflict-without-harming-either/amp_articleshow/108430899.cms
for photos.
It is said in the Matangalila, the ancient Sanskrit work on the behaviour
of elephants, that the King of Anga ordered elephants to be captured to
prevent them from raiding crops.
This was at a time when proactive management strategies never existed.
Still, centuries later, despite scientific and technological advancements,
capture is still considered the go-to option when it comes to managing the
conundrums at the human-elephant interface.
Human-elephant conflict (HEC) has become one of the greatest challenges
faced by managers, conservationists and scientists alike. Ranging from
extensive crop losses to episodic human deaths, the facets of HEC have
negatively affected the tolerance towards the species in most landscapes.
While management needs to be more proactive and balanced, addressing losses
on both sides, it has often been biased towards people-centric measures,
resulting in the ideology of ridding an area of its elephants.
Karnataka, Kerala and Tamil Nadu hold some of the largest populations of
the species and witness fairly high levels of conflict. Mitigation
techniques adopted are reactive, where elephants captured are either taken
to captivity or translocated. There is a complete overlook of the survival
and fitness of the individuals involved.
Techniques that ignore or do not take into consideration animal behaviour
while managing conflict are bound to fail. Translocated elephants have
either created more problems at the release site or in other areas as part
of their exploratory movements, and eventually ended in captivity, or have
died.
Also, capture for translocation or captivity is often carried out
haphazardly with complete disregard for elephant behaviour and their
complex sociality, and such removals tend to cause social disruption to the
population.
Removal of prime adult bulls could also possibly influence the behaviour of
the younger males in the population. Translocations are a common management
technique in countries such as Malaysia, Sri Lanka and India, with dozens
of examples illustrating its failure.
Yet another aspect is also the laxity in post-translocation monitoring.
Wildlife does not have administrative boundaries and any management
decision, especially when involving frontier areas, requires collective
planning and action.
Drive operations (where elephants are chased using vehicles, loud noise and
fire torches) are the next measure adopted, which are confrontational, and
if carried out indiscriminately can lead to behavioural changes in
elephants, making management more challenging.
https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/how-to-reduce-human-jumbo-conflict-without-harming-either/amp_articleshow/108430899.cms
How to reduce human-jumbo conflict without harming either
Sreedhar Vijayakrishnan, Times of India
March 12, 2024
See link
<https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/how-to-reduce-human-jumbo-conflict-without-harming-either/amp_articleshow/108430899.cms>
for photos.
It is said in the Matangalila, the ancient Sanskrit work on the behaviour
of elephants, that the King of Anga ordered elephants to be captured to
prevent them from raiding crops.
This was at a time when proactive management strategies never existed.
Still, centuries later, despite scientific and technological advancements,
capture is still considered the go-to option when it comes to managing the
conundrums at the human-elephant interface.
Human-elephant conflict (HEC) has become one of the greatest challenges
faced by managers, conservationists and scientists alike. Ranging from
extensive crop losses to episodic human deaths, the facets of HEC have
negatively affected the tolerance towards the species in most landscapes.
While management needs to be more proactive and balanced, addressing losses
on both sides, it has often been biased towards people-centric measures,
resulting in the ideology of ridding an area of its elephants.
Karnataka, Kerala and Tamil Nadu hold some of the largest populations of
the species and witness fairly high levels of conflict. Mitigation
techniques adopted are reactive, where elephants captured are either taken
to captivity or translocated. There is a complete overlook of the survival
and fitness of the individuals involved.
Techniques that ignore or do not take into consideration animal behaviour
while managing conflict are bound to fail. Translocated elephants have
either created more problems at the release site or in other areas as part
of their exploratory movements, and eventually ended in captivity, or have
died.
Also, capture for translocation or captivity is often carried out
haphazardly with complete disregard for elephant behaviour and their
complex sociality, and such removals tend to cause social disruption to the
population.
Removal of prime adult bulls could also possibly influence the behaviour of
the younger males in the population. Translocations are a common management
technique in countries such as Malaysia, Sri Lanka and India, with dozens
of examples illustrating its failure.
Yet another aspect is also the laxity in post-translocation monitoring.
Wildlife does not have administrative boundaries and any management
decision, especially when involving frontier areas, requires collective
planning and action.
Drive operations (where elephants are chased using vehicles, loud noise and
fire torches) are the next measure adopted, which are confrontational, and
if carried out indiscriminately can lead to behavioural changes in
elephants, making management more challenging.
https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/how-to-reduce-human-jumbo-conflict-without-harming-either/amp_articleshow/108430899.cms